Open Access

In vitro and in vivo anti-allergic effects of an extract of a traditional Chinese medicine preparation

  • Li Li1,
  • Xiao-yue Wang1,
  • Hong Meng1,
  • Guang-rong Liu2,
  • Chang Liu1 and
  • Yin-Mao Dong1Email author
Biomedical Dermatology20171:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41702-017-0005-4

Received: 23 February 2017

Accepted: 28 August 2017

Published: 23 October 2017

Abstract

Background

The present research was conducted to investigate the in vivo and in vitro anti-allergic activity of a traditional Chinese medicine formulation comprising Ampelopsis grossedentata, Saposhnikovia divaricata, Sophora flavescens, Angelica sinensis, Ophiopogon japonicus, and Cornus officinalis.

Methods

The hyaluronidase inhibitory activity of an active extract of this formulation (AEF) was evaluated in vitro. In vivo studies were conducted to explore its effects on pruritus, the anti-dinitrophenyl (DNP) IgE-induced passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) reaction, and skin repair, in order to investigate the therapeutic effects of AEF in allergic skin reactions. The inhibitory effects of the main active ingredient of AEF (dihydromyricetin (DMY)) on the pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 in phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate plus the calcium ionophore A23187 (PMACI)-stimulated KU812 cells, were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Results

An in vivo test showed that AEF produced significant inhibition of pruritus, PCA reaction, and skin barrier dysfunction. The main chemical DMY significantly decreased the PMACI-induced increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and IL-8 in KU812 cells. The in vivo anti-allergy effects on the skin may have resulted from reduced levels of IL-6 and IL-8.

Conclusions

These findings indicated that the formulation and one of its constituents, DMY, may exert excellent anti-inflammatory effects, with applications in the treatment of skin allergic reactions including pruritus, diffuse redness, and swelling.

Keywords

Anti-allergic activityTraditional Chinese medicine formulationDihydromyricetinKU812 cellsInterleukin-6Interleukin-8

Background

In recent years, increased air pollution and dietary changes have increased the prevalence of sensitive skin, associated with allergic reactions and inflammation. This problem affects human health worldwide (Farage et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2012). Pharmacological options for the treatment of allergic diseases are sometimes associated with side effects and drug resistance (Liu et al. 2014). Research into naturally occurring anti-allergy agents present in plants and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulations is therefore currently underway, with the aim of identifying effective treatments with fewer side effects (Jung et al. 2012).

The stems and leaves of Ampelopsis grossedentata provide a traditional Chinese herbal tea named Rattan, which was considered to be cool and sweet and was used to clear heat and dredge meridians. Modern pharmacological studies have shown that A. grossedentata has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial activities (Kou and Chen 2012). The main chemical constituent of A. grossedentata, dihydromyricetin (DMY), is known to have a broad range of biological functions including hypoglycemic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, hepatoprotective, and neuroprotective effects. These reported effects have led to increased research into the bioactivity of DMY over the last decade, leading to improved understanding of its pharmacological effects and their underlying mechanisms (Kou and Chen 2012).

We previously screened out A. grossedentata, Saposhnikovia divaricata, Sophora flavescens, Angelica sinensis, Ophiopogon japonicus, and Cornus officinalis from a large number of herbs used in TCMs, including for hyaluronidase inhibition, antioxidant effects (radical scavenging test using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)), and antibacterial activities. In order to obtain a formulation with better anti-allergic properties, the ratios of the six herbs and its extraction method were further optimized by the single factor and response surface methodology (Lin and Ji 2013) directed by hyaluronidase inhibition test. An active extract obtained from the formulation (AEF) was used to do further anti-allergic evaluation in vitro and in vivo.

In the present study, the effects on pruritus, anti-dinitrophenyl (DNP) IgE-induced passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA), and skin repair of AEF were evaluated in vivo. Human leukemia KU812 cells stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and the calcium ionophore, A23187, were exposed to DMY in order to evaluate the effects of this compound on levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. The KU812 myeloid precursor cell line, which was originally established from a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia, has been shown to be a suitable model for studying the activation and degranulation of human mast cells (Rasheed et al. 2009). These studies indicated that A. grossedentata and related TCM formulations have the potential to provide raw materials for the production of anti-allergy medicines and cosmetics.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

Anti-DNP IgE, DNP-human serum albumin (HSA), Evans blue, histamine phosphate, hyaluronidase, p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, fluocinonide ointment, disodium cromoglycate (DSCG), A23187, and PMA were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). KU812 cells were purchased from the Shanghai Institute cell library. Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM), penicillin, and streptomycin were purchased from Gibco (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from HyClone (Logan, UT, USA). Cytokine-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from R&D Systems (USA). DMY was purchased from Shanghai Tauto Biotech. Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and was determined to be greater than 98% pure by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Other reagents used were of analytical grade.

Sample preparation

A. grossedentata, S. divaricata, S. flavescens, A. sinensis, O. japonicus, and C. officinalis were purchased from the Beijing Tongrentang Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All herbs were authenticated by Professor Y. Peng, a medical botanist at the Institute of Medicinal Plant Development (IMPLAD), Chinese Academy of Medical Science (CAMS), Beijing, China. The optimized ratio of the herbs was determined to be 3:2:2:1.7:1.2:1.2, using a Design-Expert regression model directed by hyaluronidase inhibitory activity. The formulation (100 g) was extracted by thermal recycling with 70% ethanol (1:13) for 140 min at 68 °C and filtered. The AEF was concentrated in a rotary vacuum evaporator, lyophilized, and stored at − 20 °C until use.

The AEF was standardized based on its DMY content. Chromatographic separation was carried out on an Agilent 1260 LC series system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with online vacuum degasser, quaternary pump, autosampler, temperature-controlled column compartment, and a diode array detector. Agilent Technologies ChemStation software for LC (B.02.01) was used. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Agilent RP C18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) using a mobile phase consisting of water to acetic acid (99.8:0.1, v/v) (A) and methanol (B). The gradient program consisted of 60% (B) for 0–30 min. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and the column temperature was set to 25 °C. The detection wavelength was 290 nm. DMY was detected at around 5.6 min in this system. The DMY content of the AEF was 10.25 ± 0.83 mg/g (n = 3).

Cell culture

KU812 cells were grown in IMDM culture medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2. KU812 cells were pre-treated with the AEF (50, 200, or 300 μg/mL) for 2 h prior to stimulation with 40 nM PMA and 1 μM A23187 for different periods of time. The AEF was diluted in nuclease-free double-filtered distilled water, whereas PMA and A23187 were dissolved in DMSO.

Animals

Hartley guinea pigs (250 ± 10 g) and Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were obtained from the Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). These animals were housed under standard conditions with a 12/12-h light/dark cycle at a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C with 55 ± 10% humidity and were given standard laboratory feed (Beijing Jinmuyang Laboratory Animals, Inc., Beijing, China) and water ad libitum. The animal certification number was SCXK (Jing) 2010-0001. Animal protocols were developed in accordance with the institution’s guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the local Animal Care and Use Committee.

Inhibition of hyaluronidase activity

Hyaluronidase inhibition was determined by measuring the amount of β-N-acetylglucosamine formed from sodium hyaluronate, using a spectrophotometer (Kakegawa 1992). Bovine hyaluronidase (500 μL of 7420 units/mL in 0.1 M acetate buffer; pH 5.6) was mixed with 100 μL calcium chloride (0.25 mM) and then incubated in a water bath at 37 °C for 20 min. The indicated test sample was added in a volume of 500 μL, and the mixture was incubated in a water bath at 37 °C for 20 min, after which sodium hyaluronate (500 μL of 0.5 mg/mL in 0.1 M acetate buffer; pH 5.6) was added. After a 30-min incubation in a water bath at 37 °C, 100 μL of 0.4 M sodium hydroxide was added to stop the reaction, and the mixture was placed in an ice-water bath for 5 min. Next, 500 μL acetylacetone was added, and the mixture was incubated in boiling water for 30 min to produce a chromogenic reaction. After cooling to 25 °C, 1.0 mL of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde solution was added to the reaction mixture for 20 min at 25 °C. The optical density of the reaction mixture was measured at 555 nm using a microplate reader (RT-6000; Leidu, Shenzhen, China). All determinations were performed in triplicate.

Measurement of pruritus

Hartley guinea pigs (250 ± 10 g) were randomly divided into four groups with eight animals/group; these groups consist of model control group (physiological saline, 100 mg/cm2), positive control group (DSCG, 100 mg/cm2), low dosage experimental group (AEF, 50 mg/cm2), middle dosage experimental group (AEF, 100 mg/cm2) and high dosage experimental group (AEF, 150 mg/cm2) applied to shaved dorsal skin sites (2 cm2) on their back right feet for 2 days. On the third day, the samples were applied to the shaved sites for 10 min, followed by 0.05 mL of increasing concentrations of histamine phosphate (0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.09, or 0.1%), each of which was dripped onto the test site for 3 min. The scratching behavior induced by histamine phosphate was recorded, and the itch threshold was the level required to produce itching (Hu and Zhong 2013).

Induction of the PCA reaction

Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were divided into six groups with eight rats/group: the untreated control group, the model group (distilled water, 100 mg/cm2), the positive control group (fluocinonide ointment, 50 mg/cm2), and the high AEF (100 mg/cm2), middle AEF (50 mg/cm2), and low AEF (25 mg/cm2) dose groups. Each group had the appropriate treatment applied to the skin at three dorsal skin injection sites, which were outlined with a water-insoluble red marker. One hour later, the PCA reaction was generated by sensitizing the skin with an intradermal injection of 0.5 μg anti-DNP IgE into each of the sites. After 48 h, this was followed by a tail vein injection of 100 μg DNP-HSA in phosphate-buffered saline containing 4% Evans blue. The rats were sacrificed 30 min after the administration of DNP-HSA. The skin at the injection site was removed for measurement of the pigment area. The amount of dye was determined by colorimetry after extraction using a 1:1 mixture of acetone and physiological saline (Shin et al. 2004). The absorbance of the skin extract was measured at 620 nm in a microplate reader (RT-6000; Leidu), and the amount of dye was calculated using an Evans blue calibration curve.

Evaluation of skin repair activity

Hartley guinea pigs (250 ± 10 g) were randomly divided into five groups with eight animals/group: a blank control group (physiological saline), a model control group, and groups exposed to different dosages of AEF. The hair on the back of the neck of each guinea pig was shaved the day before the experiment to expose about 2 cm2 skin. Each group (except for the blank control group) had 150 μL acetone to ether (1:1) solution dripped onto the shaved skin. Test samples (0.1 mL/cm2) were smeared onto the shaved skin; 0.1 mL/cm2 distilled water was applied to the model control group. Treatments were administered twice daily for five consecutive days. On the fifth day, the skin moisture loss of the shaved skin was tested 20 min after sample administration. Protection rates (%) were calculated for each study group.

Cytokine ELISAs

Levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in the culture medium were quantified by specific sandwich ELISAs. Briefly, KU812 cells were stimulated with PMA (40 nM) plus A23187 (1 μM) for 12 h, with or without pre-treatment with AEF (Rasheed et al. 2009). The ELISAs were performed using the culture supernatants, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems). Plates were read at 450 nm using the RT-6000 microplate reader (Leidu).

Statistical methods

The results were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). The statistical significance of the differences between the treated and control groups were calculated using Student’s t test. Results with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Hyaluronidase inhibition activity

In vitro hyaluronidase inhibition activity was used to evaluate the anti-allergic activity of DMY, A. grossedentata, and AEF. The results (Fig. 1) showed that AEF inhibited hyaluronidase activity more effectively than DMY or A. grossedentata. It was concluded that different constituents of the TCM formulation had synergistic interactions, which led to an obvious improvement in anti-allergic activity.
Fig. 1

Hyaluronidase inhibition activity of DMY, A. grossedentata, and AEF (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Effect on histamine phosphate-induced pruritus

AEF significantly increased the histamine phosphate itching threshold in guinea pigs in a dose-dependent manner (Table 1). Allergen-induced itching is sometimes caused by the release of vasoactive substances, such as histamine, from mast cells and basophils. These results showed that AEF had a protective function when applied to the skin, and this could relieve the itching and discomfort associated with sensitive skin.
Table 1

The effects of samples on the pruritus response induced by histamine (x ± s, n = 8)

Groups

Dosage (mg/cm2)

Itching threshold(μg)

Inhibition (%)

Model control group

31.67 ± 2.58

 

DSCG

100

73.21 ± 12.49**

131.17

Low dosage

50

62.50 ± 13.69**

97.37

Middle dosage

100

85.00 ± 15.49**

168.42

High dosage

150

90.00 ± 16.43**

184.21

Tips: compared with model control group, **P < 0.01

The PCA reaction in rats

The anti-IgE antibody-induced PCA has been established as a typical model for a mast cell-dependent immediate-type allergic reaction (Shin et al. 2004). We examined the anti-allergic effects of AEF using a rat PCA model. Local extravasation was induced by a local injection of anti-DNP IgE, followed by an antigenic challenge (Lu et al. 2012). PCA was best visualized by the extravasation of dye. Administration of a high dosage of AEF 1 h prior to antigen injection significantly suppressed the PCA reaction (Table 2). PCA reaction-induced capillary permeability leads to skin inflammation and infiltration, diffuse skin redness, and swelling. AEF produced significant protection from skin allergic and inflammatory injury through inhibition of the PCA reaction.
Table 2

Influence of PCA reaction

Groups

Dosage (mg/cm2)

Amount of dye (μg/mL)

Inhibition (%)

Blank control group

3.65 ± 0.46

Model control group

100

144.32 ± 7.74##

Fluocinonide ointment

50

130.25 ± 5.14*

9.75

Low dosage

25

139.97 ± 7.22

3.02

Middle dosage

50

137.18 ± 4.98

4.95

High dosage

100

128.61 ± 12.34*

10.89

Tips: compared with blank control group, ## P < 0.01; compared with model control group, *P < 0.05

Skin-repairing activity

When the skin was scratched by acetone to ether (1:1) solution, the moisture loss was increased to 19.99% in the model group. High, moderate, and low dosages of AEF significantly decreased this moisture loss and significantly protected the scratched parts of the skin (Table 3). The barrier function of the skin has three elements: the stratum corneum (air-liquid barrier), tight junctions (liquid-liquid barrier), and the Langerhans cell network (immunological barrier) (Kubo et al. 2012). The barrier function is often impaired in sensitive skin, which leads to moisture loss, drying, and itching. The findings of the present study indicated that AEF could contribute to a restoration of skin barrier integrity, thus relieving sensitivity.
Table 3

The skin repairing effects of samples (x ± s, n = 8)

Groups

Dose (mg/cm2)

Moisture loss

Protection rate (%)

Blank control group

39.08 ± 6.51

Model control group

100

19.25 ± 3.14##

Low dosage

50

16.04 ± 0.61**

19.79

Moderate dosage

100

14.22 ± 0.67**

28.90

High dosage

150

13.87 ± 0.47**

30.62

Tips: compared with blank control group, ## P < 0.01; compared with model control group, **P < 0.01

Inhibition of IL-6 and IL-8

DMY was the main chemical constituent of A. grossedentata and of AEF (10.25 ± 0.83 mg/g). It was reported to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages and to reduce carrageenan-induced acute inflammation in vivo (Kou and Chen 2012). In the present study, basophilic KU812 cells were stimulated with PMA and the calcium ionophore, A23187. The levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and IL-8, in stimulated KU812 cells were measured by ELISA. DMY produced a significant dose-dependent reduction in the levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in media conditioned by this cell line (Table 4).
Table 4

IL-6 and IL-8 inhibition results of DMY in KU812 cells

Groups

Dose (μg/mL)

IL-6

Inhibition (%)

IL-8

Inhibition (%)

Blank control group

 

 

37.0 ± 0.8

 

Model control group

 

38.5 ± 5.2

207.0 ± 40.9

Low dosage

50

32.0 ± 6.4

11.7

182.8 ± 24.1

16.9

Moderate dosage

200

29.8 ± 2.5

28

149.1 ± 25.0

22.6

High dosage

300

15.5 ± 1.6**

50.6

102.2 ± 13.9**

59.7

Tips: compared with model control group, **P < 0.01

Mast cells and basophils are known to play a central role in inflammatory, allergic, and immune events (Galli 1993). Activation of these cells results in degranulation, accompanied by the production of chemical mediators, such as histamine, proteases, metabolites of arachidonic acid, and several inflammatory and chemotactic cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. These molecules act on the vasculature and skin, resulting in the recruitment of activated immune and inflammatory cells to the site of inflammatory lesions, thereby amplifying and sustaining the inflammatory condition (Nigrovic and Lee 2005). In various studies, pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 released during KU812 cell activation were shown to act on the blood vessels and skin, amplifying the inflammatory and allergic response (Choi et al. 2012).

IL-6 is produced by T cells, monocytes, macrophages, and synovial fibroblasts. It promotes the immune response by increasing IgE production and by increasing IL-8 expression. IL-6 is also produced by mast cells and basophils, accumulates locally in the skin, and is associated with delayed hypersensitivity. In type I allergies, antigens such as foods, dust mites, medicines, pollen, and cosmetics were bound to toll receptors on basophils, leading to IL-6, IL-4, and IL-10 release. These cytokines activate immediate hypersensitivity, increasing IgE generation and producing pro-inflammatory effects. IL-8 has potent chemoattractant activity for neutrophils and T cells. The IL-8 protein is normally secreted at very low levels from non-induced cells, but its production is rapidly induced by a very wide range of stimuli, encompassing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α or IL-1, IL-6, bacterial or viral products, and cellular stress (Hoffmann et al. 2002). The chemoattractant activity of IL-8 aggravated local inflammation and extended the development of skin allergy (Rasheed et al. 2009). The results of the present study therefore suggested that DMY and AEF produced protective effects on the acute phase of hypersensitivity, through inhibition of IL-6, and on delayed hypersensitivity, through inhibition of IL-8.

Conclusions

The TCM formulation comprising A. grossedentata, S. divaricata, S. flavescens, A. sinensis, O. japonicus, and C. officinalis (3:2:2:1.7:1.2:1.2) has significant potential for the treatment of sensitive skin. The AEF could relieve pruritus of scratched skin, repair diffuse skin redness, and restore the skin barrier function. The anti-allergic activity of AEF may be associated with inhibition of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and IL-8. These results provided an evidence base for the traditional use of A. grossedentata and related TCM formulations for the protection of sensitive skin.

Abbreviations

AEF: 

An active extract of this formulation

CAMS: 

Chinese Academy of Medical Science

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide

DMY: 

Dihydromyricetin

DNP: 

Dinitrophenyl

DPPH: 

1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

DSCG: 

Disodium cromoglycate

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay

FBS: 

Fetal bovine serum

HPLC: 

High-performance liquid chromatography

HSA: 

Human serum albumin

IL: 

Interleukin

IMDM: 

Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium

IMPLAD: 

Institute of Medicinal Plant Development

NO: 

Nitric oxide

PCA: 

Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis

PMA: 

Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate

PMACI: 

Phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate plus the calcium ionophore A23187

TCM: 

Traditional Chinese medicine

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501402).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

HM performed the animal experiment. LL did the cell experiment. XW was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. GL carried out additional analyses and finalized this paper. CL did the extraction experiment. YD designed the experiment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

Animal protocols were developed in accordance with the institution’s (Beijing Technology and Business University) guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the local Animal Care and Use Committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Beijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, Beijing Technology and Business University
(2)
Infinitus (China) Company Ltd.

References

  1. Choi SJ, Tai BH, Cuong NM, Kim YH, Jang HD. Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effect of quercetin and its glycosides isolated from mampat (Cratoxylum formosum). Food Sci Biotechnol. 2012;21(2):587–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Farage MA, Miller KW, Wippel AM, Misery L, Mailbach H. Sensitive skin in the United States: survey of regional differences. Fam Med Medic Sci Res. 2013;112(2):2.Google Scholar
  3. Galli JG. New concepts about the mast cell. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:257–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoffmann E, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Holtmann H, Kracht M. Multiple control of interleukin-8 gene expression. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;72:847–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hu YM, Zhong ZD. Study on effect of Ma Chi Xian extract for the rat foot itch threshold induced by histamine phosphate. Chin J Ethnomed Ethnopharm. 2013;6:34–5.Google Scholar
  6. Jung HS, Kim MH, Gwak NG, Im YS, Lee K, Sohn Y, Choi H, Yang WM. Antiallergic effects of Scutellaria baicalensis on inflammation in vivo and in vitro. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;141:345–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kakegawa H. Inhibitory effects of some natural products on the activation of hyaluronidase and their antiallrgic actions. Chen Pharm. 1992;40(6):1439–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kou X, Chen N. Pharmacological potential of ampelopsin in Rattan tea. Food Sci Human Wellness. 2012;1:14–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kubo A, Nagao K, Amagai M. Epidermal barrier dysfunction and cutaneous sensitization in atopic diseases. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(2):440–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin JY, Ji LH. Optimization of flavonoids from Ginkgo Biloba using response surface analysis. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol. 2013;13(2):83–90.Google Scholar
  11. Liu XY, Deng W, Li L, Meng H, Ren HK, Dong YM. Skin allergy causes, solution way, and development trend of anti-allergic cosmetics. China Cosmet. 2014;7:72–7.Google Scholar
  12. Lu Y, Li Y, Jin M, Yang JH, Li X, Chao GH, Park HH, Park YN, Son JK, Lee E, Chang HW. Inula japonica extract inhibits mast cell-mediated allergic reaction and mast cell activation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;43(1):151–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nigrovic PA, Lee DM. Mast cells in inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rasheed Z, Akhtar N, Anbazhagan AN, Ramamurthy S, Shukla M, Haqqi TM. Polyphenol-rich pomegranate fruit extract (POMx) suppresses PMACI-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting the activation of MAP Kinases and NF-κB in human KU812 cells. J Inflamm. 2009;6:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Shin HY, Na HJ, Moon PD, Shin T, Shin TY, Kim SH, Hong SH, Kim HM. Inhibition of mast cell-dependent immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions by purple bamboo salt. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;91:153–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu F, Yan S, Wu M, Li F, Sun Q, Lai W, Shen X, Rahhali N, Taieb C, Xu J. Self-declared sensitive skin in China: a community-based study in three top metropolises. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;27(3):370–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement